We rate limit accounts when they post too many low-quality comments too quickly and/or get involved in flamewars. When an account has an established history, we say that we're banning it and why. When we ban an account, we don't use shadowbanning it unless it is relatively new and shows signs of spamming or trolling, or being related to past abuses. Nobody "stifles talking about the rules". Nobody could have possibly stumbled upon r/watchpeopledie and thought it was anything other than what it said it was. Especially when said communication is hidden behind NSFW spoilers and other appropriate trigger warnings. We should not base human communication on the idea that some grown adult somehow somewhere could have such an adverse reaction to your content that they suffer serious mental or physical harm. This just feels like a rehash of the "think about the children" argument. You may think the rules prevent harm today, but what happens if and when they encourage harm tomorrow? What if the rules turned against you? Wouldn't you want to be able to speak out? The small groups of Twitter and Reddit moderators are far too small to ever represent the diversity of human thought. Allowing a small subset of people to control the rules for the masses has never, will never, and could not ever work in a free society. If you can't speak out or express thoughts against the rules, you are ceding your own ability to ever change the rules. Remove the overhead of central administration and opinion checking. Allow the platform to function within different jurisdictions.ģ. Help define the Overton window in a more organic fashionĢ. I thought about this for a long time and decided to write up what I would consider to be an acceptable framework for any given social media platform which would:ġ. And as such it is open to abuse whether it happens or not. If we're to take reddit as an example moderation happens by individuals rather than all members of the community. Reddit for example is moderated by 'members of the community'. Here, I purposefully state 'the community' rather than 'representatives of the community' as these are two very different things. Meaning that the limits of the Overton window are defined by a small set of people rather than the community itself. Today most (if not all) social media platforms seem to be relying on a central or centralised moderation system. On a related note, the r/Android subreddit, the most popular Android community on Reddit, will go dark for 48 hours on June 12 in protest of the API changes.This is a really good point. You were all wonderful in your own unique ways. The developer of Infinity for Reddit has suggested the idea of individual payment for each user’s API use. There’s also no confirmation on BaconReader just yet. What about other popular third-party Reddit clients on Android? The developer of Boost for Reddit has suggested that a shutdown may be in the cards, but it hasn’t been explicitly confirmed yet. In a post, the developer of RIF explains that the costs to keep the app running would mirror that of Apollo, despite RIF generating income “remotely near this number.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |